<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Yahoo Mail is Still an Epic Catastrophe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://variableghz.com/2009/01/why-yahoo-mail-still-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://variableghz.com/2009/01/why-yahoo-mail-still-sucks/</link>
	<description>For the technically inclined.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:51:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://variableghz.com/2009/01/why-yahoo-mail-still-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-3805</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 02:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://variableghz.com/?p=220#comment-3805</guid>
		<description>Leo,

My grandmother has since passed away since I wrote this article (on January 3, 2009) so I unfortunately cannot give her a new e-mail address anymore. Here is what I recall: I logged into her e-mail at about 3pm, I&#039;m not sure what day. It wasn&#039;t the date you see in the screenshot because I took that screenshot *after* I gave up deleting SPAM manually. She was very organized with the folders, but certainly not tech-savvy. This e-mail address of hers was about a year old, she hadn&#039;t logged in for two weeks, but the e-mail address was much older than that.

She told me that she used to just check the boxes and delete the SPAM e-mail one at a time each time she would log in. So, I proceeded to do that -- but gave up quickly because it was never ending! That&#039;s when I looked over and noticed that Yahoo somehow thought that only 75 of those e-mails were SPAM.

What a joke. Sorry, but that didn&#039;t cut it in 2008, 2009, or 2010. I&#039;ll give Yahoo a try again soon and report with a new article to see if they&#039;ve improved their game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leo,</p>
<p>My grandmother has since passed away since I wrote this article (on January 3, 2009) so I unfortunately cannot give her a new e-mail address anymore. Here is what I recall: I logged into her e-mail at about 3pm, I&#8217;m not sure what day. It wasn&#8217;t the date you see in the screenshot because I took that screenshot *after* I gave up deleting SPAM manually. She was very organized with the folders, but certainly not tech-savvy. This e-mail address of hers was about a year old, she hadn&#8217;t logged in for two weeks, but the e-mail address was much older than that.</p>
<p>She told me that she used to just check the boxes and delete the SPAM e-mail one at a time each time she would log in. So, I proceeded to do that &#8212; but gave up quickly because it was never ending! That&#8217;s when I looked over and noticed that Yahoo somehow thought that only 75 of those e-mails were SPAM.</p>
<p>What a joke. Sorry, but that didn&#8217;t cut it in 2008, 2009, or 2010. I&#8217;ll give Yahoo a try again soon and report with a new article to see if they&#8217;ve improved their game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leo</title>
		<link>http://variableghz.com/2009/01/why-yahoo-mail-still-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-3804</link>
		<dc:creator>leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 02:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://variableghz.com/?p=220#comment-3804</guid>
		<description>Are you sure the screenshot you posted is of a new Yahoo account and the 2293 inbox messages were from a two weeks&#039; period of time? First, it has lots of folders -- it seems that your grandma is really tech-savy and very well organized to get ready for all kinds of incoming mails within a short period of time after she got the account. Second, if there are 2293 inboxed spam messages from 2 weeks period of time, why there are only 6 from 12/11/08? 2293/14=164, so there should be on average 164 messages per day that get into the inbox, unless you dropped by your grandma&#039;s place and logged into her account at 1am in the morning on that particular day. My suggestion is, do your grandma a favor and get her a fresh, newly registered  Yahoo mail account instead of a second-hand, left-over one from your cousin. It is free after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure the screenshot you posted is of a new Yahoo account and the 2293 inbox messages were from a two weeks&#8217; period of time? First, it has lots of folders &#8212; it seems that your grandma is really tech-savy and very well organized to get ready for all kinds of incoming mails within a short period of time after she got the account. Second, if there are 2293 inboxed spam messages from 2 weeks period of time, why there are only 6 from 12/11/08? 2293/14=164, so there should be on average 164 messages per day that get into the inbox, unless you dropped by your grandma&#8217;s place and logged into her account at 1am in the morning on that particular day. My suggestion is, do your grandma a favor and get her a fresh, newly registered  Yahoo mail account instead of a second-hand, left-over one from your cousin. It is free after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xtachx</title>
		<link>http://variableghz.com/2009/01/why-yahoo-mail-still-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-3780</link>
		<dc:creator>xtachx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://variableghz.com/?p=220#comment-3780</guid>
		<description>Samuel,

I found a way to spam-clean yahoo mailboxes. It works reasonably well. I wrote you an email. Pls check it out and tell me. If you think its useful pls publish it!

The article is here: http://vinuthomas.com/Forums/viewtopic/p=101785.html#101785

Hope it helps someone ... even if it helps 1 person I will be satisfied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel,</p>
<p>I found a way to spam-clean yahoo mailboxes. It works reasonably well. I wrote you an email. Pls check it out and tell me. If you think its useful pls publish it!</p>
<p>The article is here: <a href="http://vinuthomas.com/Forums/viewtopic/p=101785.html#101785" rel="nofollow">http://vinuthomas.com/Forums/viewtopic/p=101785.html#101785</a></p>
<p>Hope it helps someone &#8230; even if it helps 1 person I will be satisfied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://variableghz.com/2009/01/why-yahoo-mail-still-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-3779</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 03:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://variableghz.com/?p=220#comment-3779</guid>
		<description>xtachx,

Incredible nonsense is almost an understatement; nobody is going to do that. What a mess. Yahoo is publicly traded, they have engineers on staff and plenty of money. There must be some really good reason why they can&#039;t tell their engineers to &quot;fix it and make it work like Gmail.&quot; Maybe I&#039;ll get someone from Yahoo to interview with us.

-Admin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xtachx,</p>
<p>Incredible nonsense is almost an understatement; nobody is going to do that. What a mess. Yahoo is publicly traded, they have engineers on staff and plenty of money. There must be some really good reason why they can&#8217;t tell their engineers to &#8220;fix it and make it work like Gmail.&#8221; Maybe I&#8217;ll get someone from Yahoo to interview with us.</p>
<p>-Admin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xtachx</title>
		<link>http://variableghz.com/2009/01/why-yahoo-mail-still-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-3778</link>
		<dc:creator>xtachx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 03:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://variableghz.com/?p=220#comment-3778</guid>
		<description>Yahoo does have IMAP. However, their brilliant programmers have made it unusable. This is how you use it: 

You need to append this commnd before the login command for IMAP

&quot;ID (&quot;GUID&quot; &quot;1&quot;)&quot;

This is an incredible nonsense. No standard IMAP clients come with this pre-built. You have to &quot;engineer&quot; the source code every f***in time. Brilliant!!

I have switched to Gmail, but my Yahoo mailbox has been overrun with spam, and I still have old mail / memories in that mailbox. I am trying to find a way to spam clean this shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo does have IMAP. However, their brilliant programmers have made it unusable. This is how you use it: </p>
<p>You need to append this commnd before the login command for IMAP</p>
<p>&#8220;ID (&#8220;GUID&#8221; &#8220;1&#8243;)&#8221;</p>
<p>This is an incredible nonsense. No standard IMAP clients come with this pre-built. You have to &#8220;engineer&#8221; the source code every f***in time. Brilliant!!</p>
<p>I have switched to Gmail, but my Yahoo mailbox has been overrun with spam, and I still have old mail / memories in that mailbox. I am trying to find a way to spam clean this shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike biddell</title>
		<link>http://variableghz.com/2009/01/why-yahoo-mail-still-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-2853</link>
		<dc:creator>mike biddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 09:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://variableghz.com/?p=220#comment-2853</guid>
		<description>You are absolutely right. Yahoo&#039;s biggest failing is that they do not listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are absolutely right. Yahoo&#8217;s biggest failing is that they do not listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mortimer Aloofus</title>
		<link>http://variableghz.com/2009/01/why-yahoo-mail-still-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-2044</link>
		<dc:creator>Mortimer Aloofus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://variableghz.com/?p=220#comment-2044</guid>
		<description>I have a yahoo mailbox that I only use for things like product registrations and whatnot - things that I know for a fact will only SPAM me to death.  Although Yahoo has responded to complaints similar to yours and the volume of SPAM I get DAILY (I can watch it come in minute by minute) has decreased from 2-3 THOUSAND (per day..seriously!  yowzers, those were bad days) to only a few dozen (still by far the worst amount of all available services, including Excite which is nothing but SPAM central) - yahoo is still the &quot;yucky stain on the blue dress&quot; of email.  Never mind their lack of features, never mind wanting people to pay for the privilege of getting spammed to death, it&#039;s just quite simply the worst thing you could do to yourself if you simply wanted a free online mailbox to use while you&#039;re out on the road.  Boo YAHOO!  So yeah, if I&#039;m just going to get spammed anyway, why not keep my yahoo account and use THAT for all those wonderful product registrations and free offers that come with rebates!  LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a yahoo mailbox that I only use for things like product registrations and whatnot &#8211; things that I know for a fact will only SPAM me to death.  Although Yahoo has responded to complaints similar to yours and the volume of SPAM I get DAILY (I can watch it come in minute by minute) has decreased from 2-3 THOUSAND (per day..seriously!  yowzers, those were bad days) to only a few dozen (still by far the worst amount of all available services, including Excite which is nothing but SPAM central) &#8211; yahoo is still the &#8220;yucky stain on the blue dress&#8221; of email.  Never mind their lack of features, never mind wanting people to pay for the privilege of getting spammed to death, it&#8217;s just quite simply the worst thing you could do to yourself if you simply wanted a free online mailbox to use while you&#8217;re out on the road.  Boo YAHOO!  So yeah, if I&#8217;m just going to get spammed anyway, why not keep my yahoo account and use THAT for all those wonderful product registrations and free offers that come with rebates!  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://variableghz.com/2009/01/why-yahoo-mail-still-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-1635</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://variableghz.com/?p=220#comment-1635</guid>
		<description>Forced &quot;upgrade&quot; to Yahoo mail because of an ISP DSL plan change.
Never gave my new email address to anyone: only Yahoo has it.
No IMAP, and I only receive spam: service is totally worthless.
Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forced &#8220;upgrade&#8221; to Yahoo mail because of an ISP DSL plan change.<br />
Never gave my new email address to anyone: only Yahoo has it.<br />
No IMAP, and I only receive spam: service is totally worthless.<br />
Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://variableghz.com/2009/01/why-yahoo-mail-still-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 03:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://variableghz.com/?p=220#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>J. Baker,

Gmail has no such limitation. I&#039;d suggest you switch immediately and stop paying Yahoo for their substandard service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. Baker,</p>
<p>Gmail has no such limitation. I&#8217;d suggest you switch immediately and stop paying Yahoo for their substandard service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j baker</title>
		<link>http://variableghz.com/2009/01/why-yahoo-mail-still-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-1396</link>
		<dc:creator>j baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 02:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://variableghz.com/?p=220#comment-1396</guid>
		<description>Yahoo&#039;s new e-mail interface included with my Yahoo Small Business account will not reference attachments in e-mails when selecting the print option and printing e-mails. It will only print out the body of the e-mail with no reference to any attachment to the e-mail. This is frustrating for a small business that needs to print out e-mails. I contact Yahoo support who confirmed that the new interface will not print references to attachments but will only print out the body of text of the e-mail.   The old yahoo classic interface will print reference to attachments in e-mails but its search function does not work well. Thus, I frustratingly find myself switching between the classic and new interfaces. Is GMail or some other web based e-mail more user friendly or to they too have significant shortcomings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo&#8217;s new e-mail interface included with my Yahoo Small Business account will not reference attachments in e-mails when selecting the print option and printing e-mails. It will only print out the body of the e-mail with no reference to any attachment to the e-mail. This is frustrating for a small business that needs to print out e-mails. I contact Yahoo support who confirmed that the new interface will not print references to attachments but will only print out the body of text of the e-mail.   The old yahoo classic interface will print reference to attachments in e-mails but its search function does not work well. Thus, I frustratingly find myself switching between the classic and new interfaces. Is GMail or some other web based e-mail more user friendly or to they too have significant shortcomings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

